Difference between revisions of "Talk:Against the Day description"
(Yes, I'd have to agree.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this really a blurb? Perhaps it would make more sense to call it a 'book description' or something along those lines. Pynchon's books stand out from most other published books by their complete absence of blurbs (i.e. endorsements from other writers), and calling Pynchon's own book description a blurb might confuse matters somewhat. [[User:Torerye|Torerye]] 01:14, 1 November 2006 (PST) | Is this really a blurb? Perhaps it would make more sense to call it a 'book description' or something along those lines. Pynchon's books stand out from most other published books by their complete absence of blurbs (i.e. endorsements from other writers), and calling Pynchon's own book description a blurb might confuse matters somewhat. [[User:Torerye|Torerye]] 01:14, 1 November 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Yes, I'd have to agree. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think you make a solid point, and the page name has been changed to "description"... | ||
Revision as of 00:22, 3 November 2006
Is this really a blurb? Perhaps it would make more sense to call it a 'book description' or something along those lines. Pynchon's books stand out from most other published books by their complete absence of blurbs (i.e. endorsements from other writers), and calling Pynchon's own book description a blurb might confuse matters somewhat. Torerye 01:14, 1 November 2006 (PST)
Yes, I'd have to agree.
I think you make a solid point, and the page name has been changed to "description"...
