Difference between revisions of "Talk:ATD 1-25"
(→Cut contribs- let's talk about them: archived for length and Tim's non-spoilerish spoilers) |
(→Navigation) |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
:::I don't think the full TOC at the bottom is needed, although we could do it that way. I think it'd be most convenient and inobtrusive if there were links going forward and backward to the previous and next set of pages. For example: (1-25 previous | next 57-80), if you happen to be sitting at the end of pages 26-56. [[User:Cswingle|cswingle]] Wed Dec 6 13:31:57 AKST 2006 | :::I don't think the full TOC at the bottom is needed, although we could do it that way. I think it'd be most convenient and inobtrusive if there were links going forward and backward to the previous and next set of pages. For example: (1-25 previous | next 57-80), if you happen to be sitting at the end of pages 26-56. [[User:Cswingle|cswingle]] Wed Dec 6 13:31:57 AKST 2006 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::I'm not sure users necessarily want to click "next" through each successive set of pages. I'm more in favor of just having it at the bottom of the page. If it shows up in the ToC, that's okay, right? It's easy to try out, so let me now try it out and see what everybody (or concerned parties) think. [[User:WikiAdmin|WikiAdmin]] 17:56, 6 December 2006 (PST) | ||
== Spoiler template == | == Spoiler template == | ||
Revision as of 17:56, 6 December 2006
11-30-06. Have added the tilda (˜) over the n in Richard Fariña's name in the dedication comment. That tilda makes the ñ a completely different letter and pronunciation than the 'n.' It's important to get all the diacritical marks right for Pynchon's sake (he obsesses over these, like he did over things like the shape of the ampersand on the Mason & Dixon cover)--and also because Fariña's name is Spanish, not the English word for a kind of finely ground breakfast cereal. --Pschmid1 19:59, 30 November 2006 (PST)
- no need to add sucha discussion to the talk page: just change it. Bleakhaus 12:24, 5 December 2006 (PST)
Cut contribs- let's talk about them
Ragtime
Doctorow fictionalises the same era, including anarchists, bombings, early Hollywood.--Robot 13:31, 5 December 2006 (PST)
I wonder if there isn't some way to connect the annotations by page, perhaps with a little navigation box at the bottom of each set of pages that allows you to go back and forth without having to go back to the main 'Annotations by Page' page and select the next set of pages?
One could just add this at the end with the usual double-equals section header, but then it'd show up in the table of contents at the top. Maybe not a bad thing, but I figured I'd bring it up here and see what folks thought before trying it. -- cswingle Wed Dec 6 09:28:52 AKST 2006
- The template ATD PbP inserts the following into an article when you type
{{ATD PbP}}:
| Part One: The Light Over the Ranges |
|
|---|---|
| Part Two: Iceland Spar |
119-148, 149-170, 171-198, 199-218, 219-242, 243-272, 273-295, 296-317, 318-335, 336-357, 358-373, 374-396, 397-428 |
| Part Three: Bilocations |
429-459, 460-488, 489-524, 525-556, 557-587, 588-614, 615-643, 644-677, 678-694 |
| Part Four: Against the Day |
pages coming soon |
| Part Five: Rue de Départ |
pages coming soon |
- BlakeStacey 11:31, 6 December 2006 (PST)
- well, we've got two options: place the whole table of contents at the bottom of each page, or perhaps just links to the previous and subsequent page. Bleakhaus 14:26, 6 December 2006 (PST)
- I don't think the full TOC at the bottom is needed, although we could do it that way. I think it'd be most convenient and inobtrusive if there were links going forward and backward to the previous and next set of pages. For example: (1-25 previous | next 57-80), if you happen to be sitting at the end of pages 26-56. cswingle Wed Dec 6 13:31:57 AKST 2006
- I'm not sure users necessarily want to click "next" through each successive set of pages. I'm more in favor of just having it at the bottom of the page. If it shows up in the ToC, that's okay, right? It's easy to try out, so let me now try it out and see what everybody (or concerned parties) think. WikiAdmin 17:56, 6 December 2006 (PST)
Spoiler template
I threw together a spoiler warning template which might be useful for demarcating sections of pages which have spoilers in later parts but not in all. Use {{spoiler}} to get the following:
BlakeStacey 11:20, 6 December 2006 (PST)
