Difference between revisions of "User talk:Godshawl"
(erratum page 515, line 39) |
(Spine binding red and green) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
discovered this much this | discovered this much this | ||
[[User:Godshawl|Godshawl]] 11:24, 23 December 2006 (PST) | [[User:Godshawl|Godshawl]] 11:24, 23 December 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Spine binding red and green == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The spine of my copy of ATD is bound in red (or reddish) buckram. On all other copies I have seen, the spine is bound in light green. At times publishers will change the binding because of a revision in the text requiring that change. But I have, as yet, found no such revision. Unless, of course, the two states of the binding have something to do with the pervasive doubling in the novel. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Godshawl|Godshawl]] 12:00, 23 December 2006 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:00, 23 December 2006
p. 341, line 2: "Ah, when is it not." Obviously a question, should this stand as an erratum? Godshawl 11:52, 17 December 2006 (PST) A question, but also a rhetorical question, so I'm not sure the ommission of a question mark here counts as a proper error. Torerye 02:03, 18 December 2006 (PST)
- A question without a question mark is a stylistic touch that Pynchon has used throughout his career. It's not a mistake. Bleakhaus 10:41, 18 December 2006 (PST)
erratum page 515, line 39
discovered this much this
Godshawl 11:24, 23 December 2006 (PST)
Spine binding red and green
The spine of my copy of ATD is bound in red (or reddish) buckram. On all other copies I have seen, the spine is bound in light green. At times publishers will change the binding because of a revision in the text requiring that change. But I have, as yet, found no such revision. Unless, of course, the two states of the binding have something to do with the pervasive doubling in the novel.
Godshawl 12:00, 23 December 2006 (PST)
